SLV is Not Silver
August 26th, 2008 by Terence Gillespie
Email this article to a friend
When something is rare, valuable and getting more rare then the price should go up. If the price goes down, instead, then its time to buy more, not less of it.
Since there doesn’t appear to be anything close to a free market for silver nonsensical behavior like this is possible. If the increased buying of new SLV shares as the price dropped, last week, was any indication it seems there were many who agreed with these sentiments.
I have been trying to purchase more physical silver as the price went down but have not been able to find very much of it. I did find some silver eagles at a local coin shop and the dealer wanted $4 over spot for it which I gladly paid.
In situations like this I turn to buying more shares of SLV, although it makes me very uneasy to do so. I don’t like all the layers between shares of SLV and the underlying metal. Owning Shares is definitely NOT the same as owning the metal. It is only the closest you can get to physical silver on the AMEX.
With the spot price for silver being ridiculously low its tempting to withdraw all 401K assets and purchase the actual metal instead. But, the penalties and taxes of the withdrawal have to be factored in. Another thing that makes that difficult is that I probably could not find enough of the physical silver to purchase, anyway. And that makes me suspect whether the management of SLV can find it, as well.
SLV is charged with buying and selling whatever amount of silver is needed so that the value of the shares match the spot price as closely as possible, after expenses and liabilities. I Suppose this takes skill but their trades are meant to be more ‘robotic’ in the sense that the market spot price drives their trading and not their skill at market timing.
As ETF’s age, they have to sell more and more of the underlying commodity to pay for expenses and profits. The older the ETF the less correlation they have with the underlying commodity. GLD is two years older than SLV so has less correlation with physical Gold than SLV has with Silver which is still about 99% (And falling).
While we’re on the subject, another negative for SLV is the sheer size of the silver stockpile the ETF has accumulated, now 206 million ounces. I think it makes for an excellent target for government seizure or other hanky panky some group of pricks might dream up. Who knows if they’re just leasing silver from someone else for a day to pass monthly inspections to satisfy investors of their ‘reserves’.
To sum up, I use SLV only to follow the spot price for the short term until I can manuever a way to minimize the cost of getting it out and into the real thing.
I would prefer to actually invest in real companies. There would be no reason for “investing” in an inanimate object over a company that actually creates value if the means of exchange for all companies in the US was not crumbling beneath their efforts to conduct business.
Some 401K’s are even more restrictive in the choice of investments you’re given. Then, perhaps all you can do is get out of US equities and into europe and asia. But that just gets you out of of one frying pan and into another whose temperature is not yet as hot.
It doesn’t make sense in a normal market to call Gold an “investment”. Gold is just Money, no more, no less.
I do see Silver as an investment, however, even though it is also money, because as a commodity it is currently too rare for its industrial demand. A simple fact that would be worked out in the free market, if there actually was one, for silver. Because it is a monetary metal, like gold, the spot price based on the futures market on the COMEX exchange is absurdly manipulated to make the dollar appear strong.
I’m not complaining about this. I’m glad its manipulated because when the manipulation becomes impossible, the dollar crashes, and silver and gold come back into demand as a hedge then I will benefit greatly from its manipulation.
But, I don’t need to depend on that to benefit. Even as the physical market cannot meet industrial demand the price will go up. And that would be enough for me, irrespective of any monetary premium that may or may not materialize.
Tags: commodities, dollar, gold, money, silver






















[...] a far less attractive alternative to keeping the physical metal in your possession. See my article SLV is Not Silver for more on the pitfalls of investing in [...]
[...] SLV is Not Silver [...]
Sir,
I dare say you do not fully understand what currency is or why gold, silver or other metals are used.
You are calling Gold currency and that is true. It is also true to be an Investment for many, particularly while so many countries are utilizing a fiat currency.
I would like you to consider for one moment the link between that ‘inanimate’ object and the currency. What do you see? Do you only see that it acts as a divisible, maintainable and transportable object? Of course not. Now, consider why past civilizations were able to use Notched Sticks as currency.
The short of the story is that you seem to be denying commodities their rightful reasons for being used as currency. One that we must return to usefulness: Human Input.
Any currency is a representation of Human Time and Expertise, in acquiring, refining, marketing and delivering it. Metals happen to be very good transporters of our Time and Expertise because they do not oxidize. That simple bit of the equation begins the basis for all future transactions; based on how much a human demanded to be ‘reimbursed’ for time and expertise as profit or Capital for delivering that pure once of gold.
I wish you well and enjoy your articles.
Das Ram
Das,
Well said. I agree that currency derives its value from Human Time and Expertise.
In this article, above, I’m only pointing out that owning shares of the ETF SLV should not be considered equal to owning the physical metal.
Which article on my website made you think I disagree
with your points?
Here’s why I agree that gold and silver are the best candidates for money:
http://www.youroptimal.com/blog/2008/07/15/why-is-gold-money/
I’d say we’re in agreement,
Terence
[...] SLV is Not Silver [...]